The Open Channel
|
The Open Channel is a venture borne out of a passion for
supporting change and our belief in the strength of people and organisations.
Janet Dean and Steve Loraine are senior practitioners in public sector service
delivery and work collaboratively with private sector, voluntary and community
organisations. Do contact us to
find out how we can assist you to manage your change challenges.
Led by Janet Dean and Steve Loraine, two highly
respected and experienced independent public service advisers, The Open Channel
has a fresh and highly cost-effective approach to helping you lead and manage
change. We understand the challenges you face and appreciate the financial
constraints you cope with.
Our approach is based on the view that people and
organisations are inherently strong and capable and that supporting your strengths
in times of change is a particularly positive and a more sustainable way to
lead and manage.
If you are a public body, private service provider, voluntary
and community organisation or social enterprise, you will find the services we
offer just right for your needs.
INSIDE THIS ISSUE
We report on our Leadership
Development Programme for a County
Fire and Rescue Service,
where we are using a mixture of executive
coaching, action learning and strengths models to develop the leadership
capacity of the Service.
Find out how we use the SOAR strategic planning model to assist
clients to create appreciative strategies and how this powerful approach to
planning can benefit your organisation.
Following publication of the
Joseph Rowntree Report on Creating a
Dementia Friendly York, The Open Channel is partnering with AESOP
Consortium to offer Accelerated Learning
Programmes on this topic.
And we offer some reflections
on recent experience in helping a local authority review its approach to performance management
The Open Channel Case
Study
|
We have been working with a County
Fire & Rescue Service for a number of months, supporting a team of senior
managers in their leadership development as the Service navigates the
inevitable and challenging consequences of public services reform and resource
cuts.
Our work has involved a series of
individual executive coaching sessions and strengths profiling feedback; personal
development action planning; action learning group sessions and senior
leadership event.
The executive coaching sessions
have been set in the context of the demands senior managers face in leading complex
change and how a team of managers can work collaboratively, supporting each
other to achieve individual and mutual goals.
In addition, the learning set
sessions have provided a group setting where the collective talents and
strengths of the team are brought to bear on shaping and leading organisational
change.
As the individual and group sessions
took place, another element was added - the Strengthscope profiling tool. This
is a powerful model that provides individuals with a high quality report
accurately identifying their top seven strengths in a work setting. With this
knowledge, the leaders optimise their strengths through the activities they
carry out in their own functions and in combination across corporate, strategic
projects.
The feedback from the managers
about the value of the coaching has been highly positive and their managers,
i.e. the Service’s Principal Officers, have commented on the productive change
that both the coaching and action learning have made to the strategic outcomes
the team is achieving.
Tellingly, the Service also used
the Strengthscope profiles to assist it in making decisions about the
reallocation of functions and strategic roles to each manager during a recent service
re-alignment. This is the first time we’ve seen the model used in this way to
help guide a leadership team in the alignment of its members’ strengths and the
Service’s activities. We will encourage the service to share their learning
from this innovation when they are ready.
|
For many years now SWOT has been a popular strategic planning tool for teams
and organisations. This model has provided structure and focus to future
planning conversations in organisations across all sectors. What’s noticeable
though about the model and how it’s used is that, whilst at first sight it’s a
50/50 split between negative/positive elements, in practice we find that the
conversations tend to focus overly on the negative elements, i.e. weaknesses
and threats and less on the positive elements, i.e. strengths and
opportunities. So much so that the proportion of the conversations was towards 75/25%
negative/positive, concentrating on problems and deficits, tending to drain
energy and lacking a compelling preferred future.
Now there is an alternative; SOAR (Strengths, Opportunities, Aspirations
and Results). SOAR is a strategic planning framework with an approach that
focuses on strengths and seeks to understand the whole system by including the
voices of all the relevant stakeholders.
Focusing on strengths means that SOAR conversations centre on what an
organisation is doing right, what skills could be enhanced and what is
compelling to all of those who have a stake in the organisation’s success (and
not just its leaders). Also, when you use SOAR, you needn’t abandon SWOT,
because SOAR and SWOT have a ‘both/and’ relationship, i.e. SOAR leverages the
strengths and opportunities from SWOT as a foundation and then adds Aspirations
and Results – the critical connection between our imagination and the innovation
of implementation.
We have used SOAR with Boards of Trustees, leadership teams, divisional
teams and strategic partnerships. When people use SOAR they see the ‘whole’ and their part in delivering the vision. This is how
SOAR creates greater alignment and energy to move quickly to implement strategies.
For more stories about SOAR and how to use it to create and deliver your
strategies, then contact Steve
Loraine
The Open Channel Newsfeed
Dementia Without Walls Project Report Published
Following a year- long action research
project, the Joseph Rowntree Foundation published its report ‘Creating
a Dementia Friendly York’ this month. Led by Janet Crampton of AESOP
Consortium and Janet Dean of The Open
Channel, the report was co-authored by AESOP Director Ruth Eley.
Whilst using York as a Case Study, the
report draws examples from across the UK and the world to make the case for a
dementia friendly approach. Janet Dean’s contribution in developing the Four
Cornerstones Model which uses Place, People, Resources and Networks as a way of
understanding what communities need to do, can be applied everywhere.
To help local authorities and their
community partners across the public sector and in business, culture and the
voluntary and community sectors to make fast progress in making dementia
friendly communities a reality, AESOP and The Open Channel has developed an Accelerated Learning Programme for
senior decision makers. Over the course of six months, participants can combine
their own experience with practice from outside and use the Four Cornerstones
to develop their local action plans.
At the moment, the Accelerated Learning
Programme is being offered to interested pilot authorities who need only fund
part of the cost. Please contact Janet
Dean if you would like to be considered for the Programme.
PERFORMANCE REVIEW – PROCESS OR PEOPLE?
Janet has been
working on a project for a London Borough advising on Performance Management in
Housing and Social Care. Here she reflects on the conversations she has had
with staff at all levels in the organisation.
‘When you ask people what Performance Management
means to them, there are as many answers as there are people – no wonder it’s
hard to find a way of making it meaningful.
Some people think immediately of systems – data in, information out at
best. But there is seldom one system; if there are many, they often don’t speak
to one another, and if you put in bad data, bad information will come out.
Some people talk about process – who collects what,
where it goes, how it is communicated and understood. It is not uncommon to
find that processes don’t wire round the whole system, they may go so far and
fizzle out. People at the sharp end who are inputting data, sometimes don’t
recognise it when it is presented at the top. It’s hard in this case to get
everybody to buy into the process.
Others emphasise the culture – are people interested
in performance, do they want to improve, and are they genuinely trying to work
across the organisation to make it happen. How are service users and the public
involved, can they influence performance directly? Are elected members
interested in the same issues as people delivering services, and do they all
want what customers want?
My feeling is that data and even information (i.e.
analysed data) are not going to help without knowledge – this comes when we
communicate what is happening, and understand it in the same way. But even then
we can find ourselves in the same loop. Improved performance comes from wisdom,
learning from our practice, doing more of what is good, what is going well, so
that we do less of what is going wrong.
In our experience people often start with what’s
going wrong – at The Open Channel, our emphasis on strengths means that we will
ask you what is good and help you to understand how to make it even better.’
KEEPING IN TOUCH WITH THE OPEN CHANNEL
You
can keep up to the minute with The Open Channel through our blogs and Twitter
feeds. We engage with our clients and stakeholders at @janetdean and @steveloraine
and via Linked-in. Check out the links in this newsletter, visit our blogs or
add us to your favourites’ lists via www.theopenchannel.co.uk